Skip to main content

How did militarism in Italy and Japan cause the Second World War?

Militarism is often a cause of wars and it certainly did help to bring about WWII.  Militarism can be defined in two parts.  First, it is the belief that a country should have a large military and should aggressively use that military to pursue its interests.  Second, it is the belief that the military is somehow superior to civilians, which leads to the military being respected excessively and even glorified.  Militarism was clearly present in all of the Axis powers, helping to bring about WWII.


In Japan, militarism drove Japanese foreign policy.  The military dominated the government and pushed hard for foreign expansion.  For example, it was the military that forced the government to invade China, not the other way around.  It was the military that pushed for the Pearl Harbor attack.  No other institution in society had anywhere near the prestige that the military had, which made it easy for the military to get its way.  Thus, militarism drove Japan to take aggressive actions that helped cause WWII.


In Italy, militarism was part of Mussolini’s drive to make Italy great again.  He wanted to increase Italy’s military strength to make it a major power in Europe.  A major step that Mussolini took due to militarism was his invasion of Ethiopia in 1935.  This did not lead directly to WWII in the way that Japanese militarism did, but it weakened the League of Nations and emboldened Germany.  Because Italy could get away with invading weaker countries, the Nazis felt it was more likely that they could use their own military power to get what they wanted as well.


Militarism often leads to wars because militarism encourages countries to use military force to get what they want.  Germany, Japan, and Italy all did this, causing WWII to begin.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of the greeting "Sweet dreams".

Does anybody know the etymology of the phrase "sweet dreams"? I tried googling but did not find anything satisfying. Is this a relatively new phrase of the modern world or has this been in use for some time? I think it's the latter one. Answer The OED has the interjection as "a farewell to someone going to bed" from the 20th century: 1908 Sears Roebuck Catal. 198/1 Tenor Solos..Good Bye, Sweet Dreams, Good Bye. But it goes back until at least the 19th and possibly 18th centuries. John Wolcot, writing under the pseudonym of Peter Pindar, used it in his poem "Orson and Ellen; A Legendary Tale" published in 1801: Also from 1801 in The infernal Quixote (Page 287) by Charles Lucas: In the March 1776 of The Universal Magazine was published "The Serenade. A Pastoral Tale. From the German of Gesner" , where the shepherd Daphnis watches over his beloved as she sleeps and sings: The same tale appears in 1776's as Idyl XI, " Daphnis ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are the similarities between the relationships of the characters in The Outsiders and Romeo and Juliet?

At first glance, it might appear as if the characters in  The Outsiders  by S. E. Hinton and  Romeo and Juliet  by William Shakespeare do not have much in common; however, when one isolates the core of the conflicts, it becomes clear that the relationships in both stories are rooted in rivalry and secrecy.  In both  The Outsiders  and  Romeo and Juliet , an overarching theme is rivalry. While   socioeconomic status separates the greasers from the Socs in The Outsiders , last names separates the Montagues from the Capulets, who appear to be relatively equal in terms of socioeconomic status. Due to these rivalries, there are instances of deadly interactions in both stories. In  The Outsiders , Johnny kills Bob (whether his actions were justified or not is debatable). In  Romeo and Juliet , Romeo kills Tybalt and Paris, and Tybalt kills Mercutio. These deaths have profound effects on the main characters. In Ponyboy's case, the Johnny's death and other events in the novel inspire h...
Post a Comment
Read more