Skip to main content

Is Marsha Norman's play "Getting Out" an example of a feminist play?

Getting Out can be seen as a feminist play because of the movement from which it arises and its subject matter.


Norman's drama was written in the late 1970s. During this time in American culture, the feminist movement emerged. This was reflected in the art of the time as the voices of women began to develop. Marsha Norman is a part of this movement. Her dramas focus on women's narratives. She places women at the forefront of her works. Arlene is the focus of Getting Out. The audience sees reality through her eyes, and the way the world is processed is through her frame of reference. This is a feminist idea because, as the protagonist, Arlene subverts the patriarchal narrative structure. Arlene is not an ornament. She is the primary voice. 


The way Arlene's experiences is shown is another example of how Norman's drama could be seen as a feminist work. Arlene tries to reconcile her past and present into a hopeful future. She seeks to overcome the problems she experienced as "Arlie." This includes violence, objectification, and harassment that men perpetrated upon her. This idea is a feminist one because Arlene processes what happened to her instead of remaining silent and acquiescing to a patriarchal order. Arlene has an active voice in the world as she seeks to create her own identity in it. Arlene can be seen as a feminist because she does not accept being a victim to men. She is feminist because she affirms that woman can escape destructive patterns of existence.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more