Skip to main content

In Chapter 1, in what ways is the writer a boon for medical students and his family doctor?

In Chapter One, Jerome is a hypochondriac; he maintains that he can't read a medical advertisement without concluding that he has the same ailments described in the circular. One day, in the British Museum, he reads a medical book about diseases and frantically concludes that he has experienced every disease described in the book. Despite a macabre satisfaction with this knowledge, Jerome finds himself perturbed that he has not had housemaid's knee.


After a time laboring over his supposed ill-luck, he eventually comes to the conclusion that he should count his blessings; after all, he has had every disease in the book, and one less disease would not matter in the big scheme of things. It is at this point that Jerome comes to the conclusion that he would be a boon to medical students.


With every disease known to mankind residing in his body, all the students would have to do would be to analyze him. They would not have to walk the halls of any hospital in search of diseases to study. Of course, this conclusion represents Jerome's own view and may not necessarily be shared by the medical students themselves. Rather, in studying a patient such as Jerome, they may come to quite different conclusions. Indeed, studying a hypochondriac may serve its own medical purposes, quite different from those the hypochondriac himself envisions.


As for Jerome's family doctor, having a patient such as Jerome may well be a financial boon in itself. A hypochondriac tends to imagine that he has every disease under the sun, and he often needs to see his doctor. In the story, we get the idea that the family doctor's nonchalant attitude is indicative of his frequent encounters with Jerome. As for his doctor's unconventional remedies, Jerome admits that they are quite efficacious and that he benefits from them on a frequent basis. So, from all indications, Jerome is a great financial boon to his family doctor.




And they didn’t give me pills; they gave me clumps on the side of the head.  And, strange as it may appear, those clumps on the head often cured me—for the time being.  I have known one clump on the head have more effect upon my liver, and make me feel more anxious to go straight away then and there, and do what was wanted to be done, without further loss of time, than a whole box of pills does now.


You know, it often is so—those simple, old-fashioned remedies are sometimes more efficacious than all the dispensary stuff.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.