Skip to main content

How do the characters in Murder on Orient Express affect the conflict of the novel?

Most of the characters in Murder on the Orient Express affect the conflict because they keep secrets about their true identity and play important parts in Ratchett’s murder. There are two notable exceptions: Monsieur Bouc, director of Compagnie Wagon Lits, is a former colleague of Hercule Poirot’s and brings him into the case immediately. The other is Dr. Constantine, the coroner who helps in the investigation.


The rest all tell a series of lies in order to cover their guilt. Slowly Poirot catches them by realizing the smallest inconsistencies in their stories. Everything centers around the kidnapping and murder of young Daisy Armstrong. The major conflict involves the question of who killed Ratchett, the man who was responsible for her death and got away with it.


Each character confuses the issue in order to fool Poirot. For example, Mrs. Hubbard is really Daisy’s grandmother; she makes up a story about a man in her cabin. Mary Debenham had been Daisy’s governess. Princess Dragomiroff spins numerous false stories about the other passengers. Hildegarde Schmidt is not really a lady’s maid; she had been the Armstong family’s cook.


In essence, the characters in the story add to the conflict by muddying the waters and confusing the clues as much as they possibly can. It takes all of Poirot’s ingenuity and patience to untangle what really happened on board the train that night.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.