Skip to main content

How do the characters in Murder on Orient Express affect the conflict of the novel?

Most of the characters in Murder on the Orient Express affect the conflict because they keep secrets about their true identity and play important parts in Ratchett’s murder. There are two notable exceptions: Monsieur Bouc, director of Compagnie Wagon Lits, is a former colleague of Hercule Poirot’s and brings him into the case immediately. The other is Dr. Constantine, the coroner who helps in the investigation.


The rest all tell a series of lies in order to cover their guilt. Slowly Poirot catches them by realizing the smallest inconsistencies in their stories. Everything centers around the kidnapping and murder of young Daisy Armstrong. The major conflict involves the question of who killed Ratchett, the man who was responsible for her death and got away with it.


Each character confuses the issue in order to fool Poirot. For example, Mrs. Hubbard is really Daisy’s grandmother; she makes up a story about a man in her cabin. Mary Debenham had been Daisy’s governess. Princess Dragomiroff spins numerous false stories about the other passengers. Hildegarde Schmidt is not really a lady’s maid; she had been the Armstong family’s cook.


In essence, the characters in the story add to the conflict by muddying the waters and confusing the clues as much as they possibly can. It takes all of Poirot’s ingenuity and patience to untangle what really happened on board the train that night.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...