Skip to main content

Why do we still need the Equal Rights Amendment to be approved and added to the United States Constitution?

First of all, we have to recognize that there are many people who would say that we do not need an equal rights amendment to the Constitution.  Some of these are conservatives who believe that women already have enough rights or that we should be careful about giving women equal rights because it would lead to women being drafted into the military or men being allowed in women’s bathrooms.  Others are not necessarily conservative but they believe that the problems that women face today are not really because of legal discrimination and would not be solved by an equal rights amendment.  For example, women tend to make less money than men today, but that is largely not because of any conscious discrimination.  Instead, women tend to cluster in poorly-paid jobs and women in good jobs often do not climb as high because they have to take time off to raise children.  An equal rights amendment would not solve either of these problems.  For these reasons, there are many people who would disagree with the premise of this question.


However, let us assume that we do need an equal rights amendment.  There are two main reasons for this.  First, an amendment would subject laws that discriminate on the basis of sex to the same “strict scrutiny” standard as laws that discriminate on the basis of race.   Right now, laws that treat men and women differently are not subjected to this level of scrutiny.  This means that it is easier for a law to be upheld by courts if it discriminates on the basis of sex than if it does so on the basis of race.  Second, and perhaps more importantly, an equal rights amendment would send a message, even if it would not have that much of a legal impact.  Right now, our Constitution grants greater protection from discrimination on the basis of race.  This might send the message that discrimination on the basis of sex is simply not such a big deal.  It implies that we don’t need to care enough to ban such discrimination in the Constitution.  If we added such an amendment, it would make a statement about our values.  It would clearly state that we believe that sexual discrimination is just as bad as racial discrimination.  This might not have much of a legal, tangible effect, but it would send a message that would eventually help to change our society.


For more arguments in favor of an equal rights amendment, please follow the links below.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more