Skip to main content

Why do consumers care about whether companies in an oligopoly collude? What is your viewpoint regarding the government’s role in this?

The basic theory of market economics states that free competition between companies providing consumer goods will lead to better products at lower prices.  On a personal level, when I go to the store, I look at the items on sale, and I can either select the cheapest, or I can select a more expensive item, in which case I generally have some reason for that preference.  In other words, if I choose to buy a more expensive item, it will be because I think it's better.


If there are only two or three companies producing a particular item, and they collude, agreeing to all charge a higher price than the minimum that would allow them to stay in business, then I will be forced to pay more for my purchase than if they were really competing.  And since I will see the illusion of competition, it will not occur to me to start my own company competing with them.  If there would only be one monopoly producer, and I have an idea that I could make money selling their product cheaper than they do, I would build my own factory, and soon the price would be lower, or quality would be better.  But if I think there is competition, I will be less likely to take the risk of building a factory.


So, collusion between companies in oligopoly industries (if there are hundreds or thousands of suppliers, there will always be someone to break the rules and sell cheaper than everyone else) will keep prices higher and quality lower than free competition.


Since the temptation for companies to collude is very strong, and consumers' ability to investigate and detect collusion is very small, this is a clear case of potential market failure and is therefore a valid candidate for government intervention to keep companies honest.


As an example, without this government intervention, computer and smartphone manufacturers would have colluded to keep prices high and save money on research and development and we would have missed the incredible price drops and quality improvements that we have seen every year since 1980.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

etymology - Origin of the greeting "Sweet dreams".

Does anybody know the etymology of the phrase "sweet dreams"? I tried googling but did not find anything satisfying. Is this a relatively new phrase of the modern world or has this been in use for some time? I think it's the latter one. Answer The OED has the interjection as "a farewell to someone going to bed" from the 20th century: 1908 Sears Roebuck Catal. 198/1 Tenor Solos..Good Bye, Sweet Dreams, Good Bye. But it goes back until at least the 19th and possibly 18th centuries. John Wolcot, writing under the pseudonym of Peter Pindar, used it in his poem "Orson and Ellen; A Legendary Tale" published in 1801: Also from 1801 in The infernal Quixote (Page 287) by Charles Lucas: In the March 1776 of The Universal Magazine was published "The Serenade. A Pastoral Tale. From the German of Gesner" , where the shepherd Daphnis watches over his beloved as she sleeps and sings: The same tale appears in 1776's as Idyl XI, " Daphnis ...

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

What are the similarities between the relationships of the characters in The Outsiders and Romeo and Juliet?

At first glance, it might appear as if the characters in  The Outsiders  by S. E. Hinton and  Romeo and Juliet  by William Shakespeare do not have much in common; however, when one isolates the core of the conflicts, it becomes clear that the relationships in both stories are rooted in rivalry and secrecy.  In both  The Outsiders  and  Romeo and Juliet , an overarching theme is rivalry. While   socioeconomic status separates the greasers from the Socs in The Outsiders , last names separates the Montagues from the Capulets, who appear to be relatively equal in terms of socioeconomic status. Due to these rivalries, there are instances of deadly interactions in both stories. In  The Outsiders , Johnny kills Bob (whether his actions were justified or not is debatable). In  Romeo and Juliet , Romeo kills Tybalt and Paris, and Tybalt kills Mercutio. These deaths have profound effects on the main characters. In Ponyboy's case, the Johnny's death and other events in the novel inspire h...