Skip to main content

What are examples of literary techniques used in The Joy Luck Club by Amy Tan?

As with most novels, there are a lot of literary techniques at work in this story. I'll start you off by discussing just a few of the author's main strategies.


First, the author, Amy Tan, employs symbolism to get her point across. In The Joy Luck Club, the book The Twenty-Six Malignant Gates discusses all the dangerous things that can happen to children. One could say this book symbolizes a mother's love and her desire to protect her children. It could also symbolize the ways in which mothers constantly worry about their children. Another symbol is the Joy Luck Club itself, which is a weekly meeting between women that symbolizes the importance of community and mutual support.


Second, Tan draws heavily on allegory, which is similar to symbolism in that it uses one thing to represent another thing. Allegories are stories that are meant to be interpreted to reveal their hidden meanings. Tan provides several allegories throughout this novel to explain larger concepts. For example, the fourth part of the novel features an allegory about the Queen Mother of the Western Skies, who realizes she passed down the wrong kind of wisdom to her daughter. Thus, this allegory discusses the ways in which mothers don't always know everything, and the ways that mothers can sometimes hurt their children by passing their own biases on to them, both of which are important themes in this book.


Finally, Tan writes the story using a nonlinear narrative, which means she skips around, moving forward and backward in time. She also weaves together several different characters' points of view. The literary techniques of nonlinear narratives and multiple voices woven together are important to the story's overall meaning; Tan uses these techniques partly to show us how it takes many different voices and perspectives to tell a complete story.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.