Skip to main content

What are the clues that a chemical reaction has taken place?

There are a number of clues that a chemical reaction has taken place. If any of them are observed, we can surmise that a chemical reaction has taken place. Some of these clues are:


  • Production of gas: a number of chemical reactions result in the generation of gas (or gases). Thus, a visual observation of gas generation is a clue to a chemical reaction.

  • Heat change: A number of chemical reactions either need energy for completion or generate energy upon completion. Thus, if the reaction container gets hot or cold, this change in temperature of the container is a clue that a reaction has taken place.

  • Change in color: A number of chemical reactions are accompanied by a color change, which is another clue.

  • Smell or odor: A number of chemical reactions result in compounds that produce a smell, which can be used as another clue.

  • Precipitate formation: A number of chemical reactions produce precipitates. Thus, if we observe some precipitate formation and settling, we can be sure that a chemical reaction has taken place.

Hope this helps. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more