Skip to main content

Based on the Preface, Introduction, and Chapters 1-4 of Ian Haney López's "Dog Whistle Politics: How Coded Racial Appeals Have Reinvented...

In the book, convict leasing is described as the practice of leasing African-American prisoners as laborers for agricultural and industrial pursuits.


Since the thirteenth amendment made the exploitation of slave labor illegal, Southern whites turned to the practice of leasing African-American prisoners to fill their backlog of labor needs. Companies were all too willing to pay state convict systems to secure them workers. As a whole, millions of dollars filled the state coffers of Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, North Carolina, Alabama, Georgia, Texas, and Florida during the turn of the century. In 1907, US Steel paid tens of thousands of dollars to more than 20 counties in Alabama for the privilege of securing a "steady supply of convict labor through at least 1912."


Healthy, "first-class" African-American prisoners were leased out at $18.50 a month, with the understanding that they would cut and load 4 tons of coal a day. The weakest laborers or "dead hands" were leased out at about $9 a month with the stipulation that they would produce a ton of coal a day. All laborers were lashed and tortured relentlessly by the guards in order to meet production goals. Many freed slaves were imprisoned under false pretenses so that the labor needs of companies could be filled. To save themselves from torture and certain death, many African-American families submitted to the practice of share-cropping in the hopes that powerful white landowners would protect them from the horrors of the convict system.


So, the convict leasing system essentially prolonged the practice of slavery in the South; as a practice, convict leasing did not end until the second world war.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.