Skip to main content

Explain how soap functions, making reference to its phospholipid properties.

When soap is agitated in water, structures called micelles are formed.


Soap is comprised of phospholipids, which have a polar end and a non-polar end. The polar ends, these being the phosphate heads of the phospholipid structure, are drawn to each other in a certain configuration, whereas the lipid (fat molecule) ends have a balanced non-polar structure such that they are neither drawn to nor repelled from each other.


Water, like the phosphate heads in soap molecules, consists of polar molecules that are drawn to each other. So when water (a polar substance) is agitated with lipids (which are non-polar substances) and soap particles (polar at one end and non-polar at the other), the water and phosphate heads of the soap particles are drawn together forming spherical micelle particles.


A bi-product of this action, and the key to how soap disperses fats in a water solution, is that the lipids/fats that are suspended in the agitated water solution are collected into the center of the soap micelles.


Essentially they are forced out of the way of the polar substances (the water and the phosphate heads of the soap molecules) and collect on the inside of the micelles.


They are neither drawn to nor repelled by the lipid ends of the phospholipid structure of the soap, but nevertheless end up in their vicinity (inside the micelles) because of the dominant polar environment of the solution of water they are in.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more