Enzymes are important to living things because they greatly increase the rate at which necessary chemical reactions happen in an organism. Enzymes basically are shaped in such a way that the reactants are put in position to react with each other much more quickly and efficiently than they would if they just randomly bumped into each other in an organism. In general, these are reactions that would indeed happen if the chemicals involved happened to come into contact with each other in exactly the right form; enzymes ensure that these necessary reactions happen, and far more quickly. They are biological catalysts--chemicals that speed up reactions. Enzymes are made of proteins, and are specific for a particular type of reaction. In other words, an enzyme that functions to help break down lipids in an organism would not help to break down proteins. Enzymes are also reusable--after doing their job, whatever that may be, the products leave the enzyme. The enzyme can then repeat its action.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment