Skip to main content

How does Lily react to the word "hippo"? Why does she react that way?

In the story, Lily giggles when she hears the word "hippo." To Lily, the word is a strange one, and this is why she reacts the way she does.


In the story, each newchild is provided with what is called a "comfort object" at birth. The comfort object is used primarily as a means of emotional support by all new babies. Lily's comfort object is a stuffed elephant, and when she turns eight, it will be taken away from her and given to a younger child. Her brother, Jonas, had a stuffed bear as a comfort object when he was younger.


The text tells us that these comfort objects consist of "soft, stuffed, imaginary creatures." If the soft toys resemble imaginary creatures to the children, we can infer that they have never actually seen real animals. In fact, a conversation between Lily and the rest of her family substantiates this interpretation.


When Lily expresses her frustration about a boy from a visiting childcare group, she and Jonas agree that the boy acted like an animal when he disobeyed the rules. However, it appears that neither Jonas nor Lily knows what an animal is. All they know is what they have been told about animals.



“That’s right,” Lily said, laughing too. “Like animals.” Neither child knew what the word meant, exactly, but it was often used to describe someone uneducated or clumsy, someone who didn’t fit in.



So, part of the reason Lily reacts the way she does to the word "hippo" is because it represents the strange name of a strange animal she has never seen. When you think about it, it's quite disturbing that both Lily and Jonas live in a world so heavily censored that they have no idea what animals really are.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more