Skip to main content

What are the similarities between the relationships of the characters in The Outsiders and Romeo and Juliet?

At first glance, it might appear as if the characters in The Outsiders by S. E. Hinton and Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare do not have much in common; however, when one isolates the core of the conflicts, it becomes clear that the relationships in both stories are rooted in rivalry and secrecy. 


In both The Outsiders and Romeo and Juliet, an overarching theme is rivalry. While socioeconomic status separates the greasers from the Socs in The Outsiders, last names separates the Montagues from the Capulets, who appear to be relatively equal in terms of socioeconomic status. Due to these rivalries, there are instances of deadly interactions in both stories. In The Outsiders, Johnny kills Bob (whether his actions were justified or not is debatable). In Romeo and Juliet, Romeo kills Tybalt and Paris, and Tybalt kills Mercutio. These deaths have profound effects on the main characters. In Ponyboy's case, the Johnny's death and other events in the novel inspire him to write. Because Tybalt killed Mercutio, Romeo's best friend, Romeo kills Tybalt in a rage, which one could argue also leads to Romeo and Juliet's suicides.


Beyond the rivalry, there are relationships shrouded in secrecy in both stories. In Romeo and Juliet, the love and marriage between Romeo and Juliet is kept a secret from both families until the end. In fact, the only other people who know about their marriage are the Nurse and Friar. This leads to some of the play's central conflicts. On the other hand, in The Outsiders, the development of the relationship between Cherry and Ponyboy also demonstrates a crossing of barriers. This relationship develops in secrecy and isn't revealed to the public, as Cherry refuses to interact with Ponyboy at school. The love between Romeo and Juliet and Cherry's demonstration of friendship (while shallow) demonstrates that feuds can be overcome.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.