Skip to main content

A ball is dropped from a height of 1 m and loses 10% of its kinetic energy when it bounces on the ground. To what height does it rise?

When a ball is dropped from a given height h, it has potential energy proportional to that height: 


`E^(pot) = mgh` (considering that the potential energy on the ground, at h = 0, is zero.) 


As the ball reaches the ground, all of its potential energy transfers to the kinetic energy, which is proportional to the square of the ball's speed just before it hits the ground: 


`E^k = mv^2/2` . Since the energy is conserved during the ball's fall, 


`E^k = E^(pot) = mv^2/2 = mgh` .


If during the collision the ball loses 10% of its kinetic energy, it will bounce back up with the kinetic energy equal to 90% of the original energy, or


`0.9mv^2/2 = 0.9 mgh` .


As the ball flies up, its kinetic energy is again converted to potential energy. At the maximum height, the kinetic energy is zero and the potential energy equals the kinetic energy with which the ball left the ground, or 0.9mgh.


This means the maximum height to which the ball will rise is 0.9 of the original height, 0.9 m, or 90 cm.




` `

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more