Skip to main content

How did the colonists break ties with Great Britain, win the Revolutionary War, and create a national identity?

There was unrest in the Thirteen Colonies for many years before the Revolutionary War.  New taxes, such as the Sugar Act and the Stamp Act, were considered unfair.  The Colonists were not represented in Parliament, and because of this they had no one to speak on their behalf.  The Townshend Revenue Act of 1967 taxed tea and other common commodities.  All of the taxes were eventually repealed except for the one on tea.  Protests in Boston led to British troops occupying the city.  The unrest continued, and led to the Boston Massacre.


The Tea Act was made to benefit the East India Company, which was having financial difficulties.  They had an overstock of tea, which was to be sold cheaply in Boston.  Concern that this would have a negative impact on local merchants combined with the unrest led to the Boston Tea Party.  Tea from ships in the Boston Harbor were thrown into the water in protest.  


Troops were quartered in private homes and buildings, which led to further dissatisfaction with the British government.  Samuel Adams, Patrick Henry, Thomas Paine, Paul Revere, and other people began to talk of independence from Britain.  The Sons of Liberty and other organizations were formed.  Local militias were established.  Shots were fired at Lexington and Concord and the Revolutionary War began in 1775.


In 1776, the Second Continental Congress made the decision to officially declare independence from Great Britain.  On July 4th, 1776, the Declaration was Signed.  The Revolutionary War raged on until 1783 with the signing of the Treaty of Paris.  General George Washington and other generals led troops into battle over a period of eight years.  Though the Patriot troops were initially less organized, less trained, and had less supplies, they fought on with determination.  The fact that the Thirteen Colonies spanned a large area filled with countryside benefitted the Patriot troops.  Also, the Patriots did not have a national capital.  A capital could have been captured and would have been a difficult blow to recover from.  The British wore bright red uniforms, which were easy to spot from a distance.  The Patriot troops wore ordinary clothing, and thus looked similar to Loyalist civilians.   Other countries, such as France, also sent troops to fight alongside the Patriots.


Once the war was over, the independent Thirteen Colonies  had to decide exactly what sort of nation they wanted to be.  Many signers of the Declaration of Independence and other men met in 1787 to write the U.S. Constitution.  There were disagreements, but decisions were made.  It was decided that the United States would have a system of checks and balances with three branches of government.  They did not want the tyranny they had experienced under King George III to occur again in their nation.  The Constitution also emphasized personal liberties, which was an uncommon idea at this time.  General George Washington was elected President.  In another decision to set themselves apart from other nations, the founders of the United States decided against having a king.  Instead, they wanted a leader who was elected by the citizens.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...