Skip to main content

I need evidence of Friar Lawrence marrying Romeo and Juliet in secret.

In Act 2, scene 4, Romeo is horsing around in the streets with his friends, but when Juliet's nurse approaches him in order to learn what arrangements he has made for his marriage to Juliet, he and she retire to speak privately of it.  Romeo purposely gets rid of Benvolio and Mercutio, telling them, "I will follow you," when Mercutio asks if he will go with them to his father's house (2.4.144).  Only after Romeo's friends depart does he tell the nurse of his plans.  He says, "Bid [Juliet] devise / Some means to come to shrift this afternoon, / And there she shall at Friar Lawrence' cell / Be shrived and married" (2.4.183-185).  His instruction, then, is that Juliet should make up a story, some reason that she needs to go to confession this afternoon; instead, however, when she gets there, she and Romeo will be wed.  Juliet would not have to lie about the reason for her going to church if the marriage were not a secret.  Further, at the end of Act 2, scene 6, it is only Friar Lawrence, Romeo, and Juliet who exit the scene to take part in their wedding; the absence of other guests indicate that the wedding is taking place in secret (2.6.38).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...