Skip to main content

How did social life develop in the South between 1830 and 1860 as a result of dependence on cotton?

Because the cotton gin was highly efficient and slavery made the cost of producing cotton (from the owner's perspective) artificially cheap, cotton was a highly profitable industry, more than it really should have been if workers had been free to choose other jobs.

As a result, almost all of the investment in the South during this period (what we now call "antebellum," meaning "before the war") was in cotton production; while the North had a diversified economy with many agricultural products as well as industrial manufacturing, the South became almost entirely dependent upon cotton exports for its whole economy---and hence, on slavery.

Without the need for skilled engineers and factory workers, there was little incentive to invest in education; so literacy rates were low. Cotton was profitable enough on its own, so aside from some minor improvements in the cotton gin there was little incentive to invest in technology.

Inequality in the South was extraordinarily high. Of course there were the slaves themselves, who owned next to nothing; but the majority of the population was quite poor as well, as the wealth from selling slave-picked cotton was funneled upward into a small number of rich families. This concentrated wealth came with concentrated power, and the plantation owners essentially ran the government.


Besides being obviously unjust, this economic and social system was also extremely inefficient; the South lagged behind the North economically because of the unwillingness of Southern elites to transition away from slave-based cotton plantations to more productive industries. Yet the elites themselves were doing quite well under the current system, so they had little reason to change, and fiercely resisted not only the abolition of slavery but also the establishment of new industries.  This state of affairs likely would have continued for decades more, had not the conflict over slavery with the North erupted in the Civil War.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...