Skip to main content

What 3 actions does Holmes take when he first visits Saxe-Coburg square? What is the reason behind each of these actions?

In The Red-Headed League, Sherlock Holmes is initially drawn into the mystery presented by Jabez Wilson, a pawn shop owner bestowed with a head of fiery red hair.  Wilson has an opportunity to make a tidy sum performing menial work.  Holmes uncovers a more sinister plot, that of a bank robbery led by Vincent Spaulding, a young apprentice at the shop.


Saxe-Coburg square is described as a dingy and shabby square in a less part of town.  Upon arrival Holmes' first act is to pause in front of Wilson's pawn shop and look it over.  Next he proceeds to walk up the street and "down again to the corner" looking at all the houses.  Finally he returns to the pawnbroker's door and thumbs his cane upon the walk.


The first action, the overview of the pawnbroker's shop is to further his knowledge of the client, Mr. Wilson.  Judging the paint, the exterior door, dimensions and overall character of the establishment he can gather any information on the story provided.  He may also note details about the place, such as a fresh coat of paint or new bolt where none should be.


His next action, walking and examining the other houses upon the street provides familiarity for the scene and context for the story.  He correctly deduces Mr. Wilson's pawn shop is not the intended target, but the bank next door.  The overview of the location provides Holmes with tremendous insight most people can demonstrate.  Holmes understand that any story might be the end (if the pawn shop was the target) or the beginning, with the it being just a piece in a larger puzzle.


Finally, Holmes pounds upon the pavement to test his theory.  He undoubtedly heard a hollow sound or one not consistent with is knowledge of London as a whole.  The unusual sound provided more insight into how the pawn shop was being used as a patsy to gain access to the bank.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...