Skip to main content

What 3 actions does Holmes take when he first visits Saxe-Coburg square? What is the reason behind each of these actions?

In The Red-Headed League, Sherlock Holmes is initially drawn into the mystery presented by Jabez Wilson, a pawn shop owner bestowed with a head of fiery red hair.  Wilson has an opportunity to make a tidy sum performing menial work.  Holmes uncovers a more sinister plot, that of a bank robbery led by Vincent Spaulding, a young apprentice at the shop.


Saxe-Coburg square is described as a dingy and shabby square in a less part of town.  Upon arrival Holmes' first act is to pause in front of Wilson's pawn shop and look it over.  Next he proceeds to walk up the street and "down again to the corner" looking at all the houses.  Finally he returns to the pawnbroker's door and thumbs his cane upon the walk.


The first action, the overview of the pawnbroker's shop is to further his knowledge of the client, Mr. Wilson.  Judging the paint, the exterior door, dimensions and overall character of the establishment he can gather any information on the story provided.  He may also note details about the place, such as a fresh coat of paint or new bolt where none should be.


His next action, walking and examining the other houses upon the street provides familiarity for the scene and context for the story.  He correctly deduces Mr. Wilson's pawn shop is not the intended target, but the bank next door.  The overview of the location provides Holmes with tremendous insight most people can demonstrate.  Holmes understand that any story might be the end (if the pawn shop was the target) or the beginning, with the it being just a piece in a larger puzzle.


Finally, Holmes pounds upon the pavement to test his theory.  He undoubtedly heard a hollow sound or one not consistent with is knowledge of London as a whole.  The unusual sound provided more insight into how the pawn shop was being used as a patsy to gain access to the bank.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.