Skip to main content

The New Horizons spacecraft passed Pluto in July 2015. At the time of closest approach on July 14, 2015, Pluto was 34 AU from the Earth. How long...

Despite using distances that are big, this question is using a basic equation.  Speed = Distance/Time.  That equation can be reordered to read Time = Distance/Speed.  


The distance in this case is 34 astronomical units.  I'll leave it in that unit.  Converting to miles or kilometers will make these numbers huge.  The speed of light is 300,000,000 m/s.  It is going to work best to convert the speed of light into astronomical units per second.  That number is 0.00200399 AU/sec.


We can now use the initial equation.  


Time = Distance/Speed


Time = 34 / 0.00200399


Time = 16966.1525257 seconds


Let's round that to 16,966 seconds.  Divide by 60 to get minutes.  


That's about 282.767 minutes.  Divide by 60 again to get hours.    


That's roughly 4.713 hours.


In hours, minutes, and seconds, that comes out to be 4 hours, 42 minutes, and 46 seconds.   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.