Skip to main content

How important is movement in the play Waiting for Godot ?

This is a penetrating question.  Of course, the main emphasis is the non-movement, the inertia of inactivity in the plot (emphasized by the important last line: “They do not move.”)  But there are two other “movements” in any stage performance.  “Blocking” (the changes of position by the actors) and “gesture” (the language of stage gestures, both realistic and artificial, of the actors’ hands, head, posture, etc.)  In blocking, Beckett has prescribed much of it:  Pozzo and Lucky’s entrance, for example. But the director must choose the proxemics (the closeness and distance between characters at any time).  In stage “business,” for example in the burlesque business of changing hats, or the examining of boots, the director must select details of the movements for rhythm and realism.


But what makes your question so intriguing is the overriding thematic idea that movement itself, for Gogo and Didi, is simply a means to “pass the time.”  The meaninglessness of all effort is emphasized by the futility of “action” itself:  “Did they beat you?”  “Of course they beat me.”  This futility is condensed in the scene where the tramps consider hanging themselves on the tree.


Finally, the most condensed movement on the stage is the appearance of a leaf on the tree in Act Two.  Sudden, out of range of the tramps’ control, occurring in the timeless space between acts, it finalizes the purpose of all movement, in the play or in the world: Change is illusionary and meaningless, merely the random fluttering of existence in the winds of nothingness.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more