Skip to main content

What does Madam Forestier lend Mathilde to wear to the party in "The Necklace" by Guy de Maupassant?

Madame Forestier lends Mathilde a necklace that Mathilde thinks is made of real diamonds but turns out to be costume jewelry.


Mathilde Loisel is upset when her husband says he has an invitation to a fancy ball. She always wishes she had more money and prestige than she does, so he thinks it is a big score. He expects her to be thrilled, but she is upset because she doesn’t think she has the right clothes for the occasion.



She had no clothes, no jewels, nothing. And these were the only things she loved; she felt that she was made for them. She had longed so eagerly to charm, to be desired, to be wildly attractive and sought after.



Her husband gives Mathilde the money he has been saving up to buy a new gun for hunting so she can buy a dress, but she is still unhappy because she doesn’t have a jewel. Her husband suggests flowers are in fashion, but she is not satisfied. He then reminds her that she has a rich friend, Madame Forestier. Mathilde likes this suggestion.


Madame Forestier is willing to lend Mathilde anything she wants. She makes some suggestions, but Mathilde chooses what she thinks is the flashiest and most expensive jewel.  It looks like a diamond.



Suddenly she discovered, in a black satin case, a superb diamond necklace; her heart began to beat covetously. Her hands trembled as she lifted it. She fastened it round her neck, upon her high dress, and remained in ecstasy at sight of herself.



Her friend has no problem lending her the jewel, and is nowhere near as excited about it as Mathilde. Mathilde is the delight of the ball. Everyone looks at her, just as she hoped.  Unfortunately, Mathilde loses the jewel. She and her husband are horrified because they think it is very expensive.


Mathilde and her husband go to a jeweler, who says he did not sell the necklace. After negotiating, they buy a replacement and give it to Madame Forestier without telling her about losing the first one. It takes them years to pay it off. Just when they pay it off, Mathilde learns the necklace she lost was fake.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.