Skip to main content

What gives a book its longevity??

In the long run what gives a book its longevity is the young people who read it. Emerson says something to the effect that every book, no matter how famous, must appear for judgment before each succeeding generation. If only one generation of young readers fails to appreciate that book, it can mean the end of the book's longevity. Young readers have continued to like F. Scott Fitzgerald's novel The Great Gatsby for generation after generation. This is simpatico because he deserves to be remembered. He was a genius. His life was tragic, and his books all seem haunted by tragedy.


The Great Gatsby is almost a hundred years old. What is it about this book that appeals to one generation after the next? The writing, of course, is beautiful. Fitzgerald writes like a poet, and the poet he most resembles is John Keats. He writes about love, and young people are especially interested in that subject, which probably explains why the novel is assigned in so many high school and college English classes. Probably most importantly, Fitzgerald writes about all the suffering that goes on among young people while they are having such a wonderful time. He brings the Jazz Age back to life, with its music and dancing which were so different and yet so much the same as today's. The Great Gatsby makes contemporary young readers identify with the young people of an extinct era. It brings to mind James Joyce's beautiful sentence in his novel Ulysses, describing the souvenirs Stephen Dedalus finds in his mother trunk after her death.



Phantasmal mirth, folded away: muskperfumed.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...