Skip to main content

How does the narrator in Sredni Vashtar encourage the reader to empathize with the protagonist?

In Saki's story "Sredni Vashtar," a small boy's disquieting behavior is oddly justified. The reader finds himself taken in by Saki's portrayal of the beleaguered spirit of Conradin. Conradin suffers from a loneliness anyone can understand. He is harassed by the nagging of his overbearing cousin and lives primarily in the halls of his imagination.



"One of these days Conradin supposed he would succumb to the mastering pressure of wearisome necessary things--such as illnesses and coddling restrictions and drawn-out dullness. Without his imagination, which was rampant under the spur of loneliness, he would have succumbed long ago."



Saki skillfully guides the reader into Conradin's perspective. He is not just a small boy aimlessly entertaining himself in a tool-shed; he is a noble personage fighting banality and tedium. Without Saki's masterful writing, we might not see this household as a battleground. But we see a battleground as plain as day when we see life through Conradin's eyes. And in battle we must take sides. The reader naturally falls into step with Conradin against his guardian and cousin, who



"...would never, in her honestest moments, have confessed to herself that she disliked Conradin, though she might have been dimly aware that thwarting him 'for his good' was a duty which she did not find particularly irksome."



Mrs. De Ropp takes pleasure in bossing around Conradin. We rally for Conradin.

Through the eyes of the story, we see Conradin fighting for his life. Conradin's imagination envelops us. When the ferret mortally attacks the purse-lipped cousin, the reader momentarily exalts at the victory and then is appalled at Conradin's cold-hearted response. The reader is left feeling guilty for having aligned with Conradin. Saki has tricked us.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.