Skip to main content

What did Columbus accomplish on his second voyage to the New World?

On his second voyage to the New World, having already visited Hispaniola and the south of Cuba on his first, Columbus sought to continue his exploration in the Caribbean. He brought with him a number of slaves, farmers, soldiers, and priests who would help colonize the lands he claimed for Spain. On this journey, he visited the Canary Islands, the Lesser Antilles, the Greater Antilles, and Puerto Rico. He is also credited with having sighted the Virgin Islands and naming a number of islands, including Guadelupe, Saint Croix, and Antigua. He captured a number of natives during this time and brought with himself and his crew a number of diseases which the native populations had no immunity to. His people also built several forts to maintain the Spanish presence in the New World. Upon returning to Europe, he brought with him exotic animals, spices, gold, and the belief that he had discovered a Biblical paradise.


Columbus' greatest accomplishments perhaps total to being the first European to navigate the Caribbean so successfully and bestowing a number of new names upon the islands. Charting these waters and bringing knowledge to the Old World was no easy pursuit, but his legacy of exploitation and genocide is significantly overshadowed by these feats.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.