Skip to main content

What is the most important piece of information revealed in act 1 of The Crucible? Why?

The most important piece of information revealed in Act 1 is Abigail Williams's confession to John Proctor that Betty Parris, her cousin, is not suffering as a result of some witchcraft they performed.  She says, "We were dancin' in the woods last night, and my uncle leaped in on us.  She took fright, is all."  This is terribly important information because it helps the audience to understand that later, when Abigail begins to accuse people in the town of witchcraft, it is all a lie; there is simply no truth to it.  She's admitted it herself.  Therefore, when Abigail later claims to see strange specters of witches who have sent out their spirits to hurt her, we know that she is concealing the truth and telling these fictions instead.


Further, it is this piece of information that compels Elizabeth Proctor to try to convince her husband to speak with the magistrates about Abigail's motives and dishonesty in Act 2.  This discussion between the two of them reignites her suspicions of him and his anger at her continued distrust of him.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.