Skip to main content

How would free healthcare in the United States change the expenses of people in the lower class, middle class, and upper class?

The first issue here is that "free" health care isn't actually free. Hospitals, doctors, and medications all cost money. The actual issue is how those costs are paid for and by whom. In some countries, patients pay health care providers directly. In other countries, people tend to buy insurance and insurance companies then pay all or part of medical costs. The standard model in most developed countries is some form of national healthcare, usually with a single payer model, in which the government collects taxes and uses tax money to pay the health care costs of all citizens and permanent residents.


The current system in the United States is actually a mixture of government (i.e. taxpayer) funded health care available to veterans, lower-income families, and the elderly, for-profit insurance, and direct payment to providers. 


What changes people will experience in health care-related costs if a single payer system was instated would depend on implementation details. For veterans, the elderly (Medicare eligible), and the poor (Medicaid eligible), a switch to a single payer system might not not change their costs or benefits.


For workers who already have insurance plans through work, out-of-pocket medical expenses might be lower. Currently, approximately 60 percent of bankruptcies in the US are related to medical debt; this number would decrease markedly under a single payer system. People in lower- and middle-income brackets who are not Medicaid-eligible would probably see the greatest benefits. People in the middle- and upper-income brackets would see a reduction in out-of-pocket medical expenses and insurance costs.


The question remains, though, of how such a system would be financed. It would require some form of increased taxation or perhaps mandatory insurance contributions on a sliding scale. While consolidation of Medicare, Medicaid, and VA benefits under a single payer system would result in some cost savings, some people would still need to pay additional taxes to fund a single payer system. If such a tax plan closed loopholes such as the difference between higher taxes on wages and lower ones on capital gains (which benefits the wealthy), then the wealthy would pay higher taxes. An across-the-board tax increase or fixed levy might increase tax rates for some, but this might be offset by lower medical costs. 


Realistically, the answer to this question depends entirely on implementation details; without those, one cannot know actual numbers.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more