Skip to main content

Why didn't Charlotte tell Captain Jaggery about her adventure in the hold? What did she think would happen?

After Charlotte is left alone near the entrance of the hold, a frightening occurence happens: a "grinning head" appears through the entrance to the hold, and Charlotte's candle goes out, plunging her into complete darkness. Charlotte bravely climbs down into the hold to investigate, and finds a hideous carving of a "humanlike face" that had been placed down there to scare her. Despite her relief that she is not in any immediate danger, Charlotte is still concerned that someone is willing to play such a cruel trick on her... Could these tricks only get worse as the journey continues? 


Charlotte knows that Captain Jaggery has requested that she tell him if she notices anything "untoward" happening on the ship; however she decides that reporting this mysterious incident to Jaggery would result in him perceiving her as "a sorry, troublesome child," which is the last thing Charlotte wants to be labeled as. Charlotte is determined to stay on the "good side" of Jaggery, and thinks that it is the safest move to be "infinitely more partial to the captain." 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.