Skip to main content

What are the advantages of reducing air resistance on a car?

There is one main advantage to reducing air resistance on a car.  The advantage is that this reduces the amount of drag on the car, thereby reducing the amount of fuel that is needed to drive the car at any particular speed and for any particular distance.


When a car is driven, it converts the chemical energy in its fuel into kinetic energy (motion).  However, not all of the chemical energy in the fuel converts to kinetic energy.  Instead, some is lost to heat and some to sound.  The heat and the sound are caused by friction.  One source of friction is air resistance.


If we reduce the amount of air resistance on the car, less of the chemical energy will be converted into heat and sound.  This is beneficial because, when we drive a car, we want as much of the chemical energy as possible to be converted into kinetic energy.  We do not want to waste our fuel making heat and noise.  By reducing the amount of air resistance, we improve the efficiency of our fuel usage.  We increase the distance that we can drive on any given amount of fuel.  This is very useful for car owners (and for society as well since it means that we waste less of our resources).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.