Skip to main content

What is the process for amending our Constitution? Where would amendments originate? How are they approved?

This answer is based on the assumption that you are asking about the United States Constitution.


There are two ways that amendments to the Constitution can be proposed.  One way is to call a convention that would propose amendments.  Two-thirds of the states would have to ask Congress to call such a convention.  The convention would then propose whatever amendments it wanted.  This method has never been used.  The other method is to have Congress propose the amendment(s).  A member of Congress proposes an amendment.  If two-thirds of each house of Congress approves, the amendment then goes to the states to be ratified.  So, all of the amendments to the Constitution so far have originated in Congress.  Anyone may suggest an amendment, but only a member of Congress can actually officially submit one for consideration.


There are also two ways in which an amendment can be approved.  Again, one method is used much more often than the other.  It is possible for every state to call a convention to vote on whether to ratify an amendment.  If three-fourths of the conventions vote to ratify, the amendment is approved.  This method has only been used once.  The method that has been used for all the other amendments is to have the state legislatures vote on the proposed amendment.  Again, if three-fourths of the states vote to approve, the amendment passes and becomes part of the Constitution.  There is no provision for a popular vote on constitutional amendments.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.