Skip to main content

What is the relationship between Brian Friel's Translations and the "What's in a name?" quote from Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet?

Brian Friel's Translations depicts the beginning of the end of the Irish language, as it focuses on the efforts of a group of English mapmakers and soldiers translating Irish place names into English. In the play, the act of translation becomes an act of existential destruction, as Friel equates the extinction of the Irish system of naming with a loss of identity. 


It's interesting indeed to compare this idea to the "What's in a name?" quote from Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet. This quote is spoken by Juliet in Act 2, Scene 2, and the general implication here is that a name theoretically shouldn't have much significance. More specifically, Romeo's Montague name shouldn't define him or prevent Juliet from loving him. As such, in this quote Shakespeare questions the notion that names can provide a meaningful or rigid identity.


It goes without saying that Friel would disagree with Shakespeare. Translations suggests that naming does have significance, as it imparts a particular identity that cannot be easily replicated. As such, the central relationship between the "What's in a name?" quote in Romeo and Juliet and Translations is one of disagreement, as the latter rejects the former's notion that naming is arbitrary and imparts little meaning or identity to the recipient. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more