Skip to main content

How did Roman dramatic literature evolve from the absorption of Greece through its golden age of dramatic literature to its first Christian...

Before cultural contact with Greece, Roman culture had forms of entertainment including athletic and gladiatorial contests, musical performances, perhaps mime, and other acts that share much in common with modern circuses such as jugglers. Roman drama per se was built mainly on Greek models.


The comedies of Plautus and Terence were usually translations or adaptations of Greek New Comedy, especially of the works of Menander. They usually had romantic plots and many stock characters including clever servants, lustful old men, innocent young lovers, boastful soldiers, and evil pimps. While actors were all men during the Republic, during the Empire, women began to appear on stage. 


The main Roman tragedies that have been preserved are those of Seneca, which are also based on Greek myths, but are not direct adaptation of Greek playwrights. They tend to be more melodramatic than Greek plays.


Dramatic adaptations of the Gospel story began in medieval England. They slowly evolved from minor variations of the Latin liturgy (especially Easter) into vernacular dramas retelling key parts of the Gospel for those who were illiterate and did not know Latin. As this happened some five centuries after the fall of the Roman Empire, it is usually not considered part of Latin dramatic literature but rather part of the evolution of drama from classical to early modern forms. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...