Skip to main content

How did Roman dramatic literature evolve from the absorption of Greece through its golden age of dramatic literature to its first Christian...

Before cultural contact with Greece, Roman culture had forms of entertainment including athletic and gladiatorial contests, musical performances, perhaps mime, and other acts that share much in common with modern circuses such as jugglers. Roman drama per se was built mainly on Greek models.


The comedies of Plautus and Terence were usually translations or adaptations of Greek New Comedy, especially of the works of Menander. They usually had romantic plots and many stock characters including clever servants, lustful old men, innocent young lovers, boastful soldiers, and evil pimps. While actors were all men during the Republic, during the Empire, women began to appear on stage. 


The main Roman tragedies that have been preserved are those of Seneca, which are also based on Greek myths, but are not direct adaptation of Greek playwrights. They tend to be more melodramatic than Greek plays.


Dramatic adaptations of the Gospel story began in medieval England. They slowly evolved from minor variations of the Latin liturgy (especially Easter) into vernacular dramas retelling key parts of the Gospel for those who were illiterate and did not know Latin. As this happened some five centuries after the fall of the Roman Empire, it is usually not considered part of Latin dramatic literature but rather part of the evolution of drama from classical to early modern forms. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.