Skip to main content

In Gulliver's Travels by Jonathan Swift, how do the little people deal with Gulliver's large appetite? What qualities do they reveal?

At first, the Lilliputians consider starving Gulliver because they recognize that it is going to be very costly to feed him; however, they then consider how difficult his carcass will be to get rid of if he dies, and they fear the contagion that could spread around the kingdom as a result.  They decide initially to feed him while they figure out what they want to do with him in the long term, bringing him several cows, dozens of sheep, a large quantity of bread and wine, etc., each morning.  Eventually, they figure out that Gulliver's body is the equivalent of 1728 of theirs, and so he will require 1728 times more food each day than each of them.  Swift, therefore, encourages his audience to consider the Lilliputians' "Ingenuity" in addition to "the prudent and exact Economy of so great a Prince."  It is clear that they also have some skill in Mathematics, and they are very practical and unemotional in this sense: they opt to keep Gulliver alive because it is ultimately the lesser of two evils. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more