Skip to main content

Why do humans need sleep?

Unfortunately, the scientific community isn't totally in agreement as to why humans need sleep. Our best guess is that sleep offers the body a chance to restore and rejuvenate as well as process memory. 


Restful sleep allows the body to focus on just the basic and vital functions of breathing, pumping blood, and repairing or generating new cells and tissues. When we're awake throughout the day, we are spending our bodily energies on other activities like walking, working, and thinking. Sleep is a break for both body and mind, allowing our energy to be directed towards maintaining a healthy body.


Neurologists also feel sleep is a time for our brains to process all of the short-term memories acquired during the day, "sort" through them, and decide what should be processed into long-term memory. This is a possible reason behind why dreams often contain some of the things we've done or thought about or people we've seen during the day.


It's very important to get enough sleep so your body has a chance to perform these restorative maintenance functions. Most people need around eight hours of sleep, but depending on your age and activity level, you may need more or less than this. As long as you feel well-rested, you're probably getting enough sleep!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more