Although he is fairly ordinary at heart, Winston Smith functions as the main hero in George Orwell's dystopian world. This fact might surprise some readers; after all, Winston succumbs to torture at the end of the novel and finishes the narrative as a devout follower of Big Brother. While his end might be tragic, Winston spends the vast majority of the novel exhibiting a quiet and inspiring heroism, so it would be mistaken to judge him solely on his miserable fate in the final pages of 1984. The clearest example of Winston's heroism occurs quite early in the novel: in the first chapter, he steals home to write his thoughts in a diary. This seemingly simple act is perhaps Winston's most heroic moment. Since Big Brother polices the minds of its citizens and punishes those who dare to think for themselves, the decision to record independent ideas in a journal is a rebellious act against the established order. As such, Winston's early decision to rebel by thinking (and writing) for himself is a clear example of his heroism.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment