Skip to main content

In the first line, the persona uses the verb "were." What does this tell us about those whom he considers truly great?

At the beginning, the speaker is talking about people who once "were" alive. This is a poem about human potential (past or future), but the speaker does focus on the past and those who "were truly great."


But note that this emphasis on the past is more complex than a simple acknowledgment of the great ones in history. In the first stanza, the speaker talks about how the great ones remember the soul's history and how this occurs through "corridors of light" with time measured in "suns." These are Platonic ideas. Plato said that absolute truth is represented by the sun: the eternal light. He also said that a person is born and, in order to achieve great knowledge, he/she must remember what his/her eternal soul has forgotten in the process of being born into the world. This is called anamnesis and it means that a person must remember what he knew prior to being born.


Given the context of the rest of the poem, this idea of remembering relates to the history of human knowledge and the more abstract idea of spiritual humanity. With the former, there is the notion that a great thinker can learn, relearn, or intuit human ideas of the past. With the latter, there is the notion that a great thinker is spiritually connected to great knowledge in an abstract or universal way. So, these materialistic and spiritual ideas of remembering and relearning imply that the great thinkers are always already connected to the past in different ways. This is why "were" is in the title and in the first line. Any great thinker in the future will likewise understand these material and spiritual connections to the past.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more