Skip to main content

Why did Republicans in Congress want to impeach Andrew Johnson?

The Radical Republicans in Congress felt that Andrew Johnson, a southerner, was too easy on the south during Reconstruction. The Republicans in Congress, such as Thaddeus Stevens and Charles Sumner, wanted to radically reform the south to abolish the old planter class, while Johnson's plan for Reconstruction was more lenient.


The Republicans watched as the Black Codes were instituted in states such as Mississippi; these laws prevented the free movement of former slaves and abridged some of their other civil rights. In response, the Republicans wanted to pass the Civil Rights Act of 1866, but Johnson vetoed it, saying that it infringed on states' rights. In addition, in 1866, Johnson vetoed the bill to renew chartering for the Freedmen's Bureau (founded in 1865), which had provided assistance to former slaves such as finding family members, education, and the promotion of fair labor contracts between former slaves and plantation owners. Johnson also dissuaded states from passing the 14th Amendment, which gave citizenship and due process rights to African-American people.


As a result of these feuds, the Congress passed the Tenure of Office Act in 1867, which limited Johnson's power to remove cabinet members. When he removed Secretary of War Stanton, who was a member of the Radical Republicans, the House moved to have Johnson impeached. He was saved by conviction in the Senate by a single vote. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more