Skip to main content

In the Forbes article "The Video Game Blurs the Line Between Education and Entertainment," a game that can enable middle schoolers to strengthen...

Is the "gamification" of education a passing fad or the tip of the iceberg?  


I'm going to say both, but I need to explain why.  Ultimately, it will be a passing fad, but the fad may last for many decades.  I've been teaching long enough to have seen and been through styles of teaching that have been around for many, many years, and I have seen long standing, traditional styles of education begin to fade out.  I believe that given enough time, any current style of teaching and learning has the ability to go away.  Games to learn math through isn't any different.  I believe the better question is how long will it stick around?  


I believe that it will stick around for a long time.  I do indeed believe that it is the tip of the iceberg.  For example, the school that I teach at is in the second year of one to one education.  That means every student has a laptop.  My school is not the only school in San Diego to do this.  It has to be stated that the way teachers in my school address their content has changed because of the technology.  For example, our technology class has students design working apps for Android, Chrome, and Apple.  Sure, we teach the basics of how to code, but the majority of that learning is done through a game that teaches students how to code.  That is then followed by the students using trial and error within the actual coding programs.  The curriculum works much better than traditional lecture and test.  


Science classes make use of Google Maps and the satellite view to see how rivers and deltas really look.  English classes use timed racing games (with virtual cars) for vocabulary review.  History classes make use of apps that have students design quiz shows.  The quiz show is displayed on the big screen monitor, and student teams have to select the answer (digitally) before another team does.  


Education conferences are becoming more and more focused on how teachers can integrate technology and "gamification" into existing curriculum.  I have even presented at a Google Conference on how I integrate into my own classroom.  Many companies are designing and selling self contained digital curricula that seamlessly attempt to blend traditional education with teaching and learning games.  Schools are slowly beginning to adopt things like that, but many of them are in their infancy.  They will only get better and more popular.   


In addition, the Forbes article even admits that the blurring of teaching, learning, and gaming is probably a good thing.  



Done responsibly, it may in fact be a good thing to blur the line between education and entertainment.



As more and more educators realize the benefits to learners that games for education offer, the more teachers and schools will ask for it.  Add that to the fact that companies like Amplify are for-profit businesses.  As more and more companies like Amplify realize there is a market that can make a lot of money, they will start competing very hard for school money.  The products will get better because of that, which will in turn increase demand.  The entire process will become cyclical, which is another reason that I think educators are seeing the tip of the iceberg.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...