Skip to main content

What does the GDP, gross domestic product, measure?

Gross Domestic Product measures the total amount of economic activity in a given year. The calculation of GDP is meant to measure the total amount of production and consumption of goods and services, as well as imports and exports. Although GDP is a rough guide to estimate economic activity in a given year, it is most useful for terms of comparison over discreet periods of time. Economists and policymakers are constantly revising their projections of GDP before and after the so-called "final results" are tabulated, so although GDP projections are used to guide economic policy, many policymakers prefer to use specific components of GDP, such as existing and used home sales, core inflation (CPI), payroll data, consumer spending, or surveys from the Institute of Supply Management, which measures factory orders and inventory buildup. All of these measurements, plus many, many more, are added together in order to calculate total GDP.


Therefore, GDP is most useful as a tool to chart the growth or contraction of a country's economy and the various segments of that economy over a period of time. GDP is generally measured in terms of total output in a particular currency, such as dollars in the United States, as well as in percentages of growth or contraction. During a recession, annual GDP will often be expressed as "minus" a certain percentage (for example, a contraction of 1.3 percent), while during an economic expansion, GDP is most often reported as "plus" a certain percentage, as in, "GDP grew last year at an annualized rate of 2.2 percent." Although GDP is useful for measuring total economic output, it does not does measure the economic reality facing individuals, nor does it attempt to. Rather, GDP is a macro, bird's eye view of the economy.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more