Skip to main content

In John Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men, how can we tell that George takes care of Lennie?

It is apparent from the very beginning of Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men that Lennie is mentally challenged. Steinbeck first suggests this when Lennie is quite pleased with himself after producing splash rings in the river where he and George stop in Chapter One. Lennie is also carrying a dead mouse in his pocket, symbolic of his childlike obsession with petting soft things. Lennie is also obsessed, like a child waiting for Christmas, with the prospects of "tending rabbits" on the farm which he and George hope to one day own. George is obviously Lennie's caretaker, making sure that Lennie eats regularly and has a job.


Lennie had originally been cared for by his Aunt Clara, but when she died, he went on the road with George. George makes important decisions for Lennie and in Chapter One, he is holding Lennie's work card, which will be used to work on the ranch where they are headed near the small central California town of Soledad. Lennie is, however, quite a handful and, although George genuinely seems to love him, he is often frustrated by Lennie's actions, such as the incident in Weed involving a girl in a red dress. Despite this, he cares for Lennie like a brother, mediating their first meeting with the boss and asking Slim if Lennie can have one of his puppies.


George also warns Lennie about interacting with Curley and Curley's wife. Unfortunately, Lennie is unable to avoid trouble, and his fight with Curley is followed by the episode in the barn when he accidentally kills Curley's wife. Even though George does his best to take care of Lennie, it isn't enough. In the end, he does what he believes is the most humane thing for Lennie by shooting him in the clearing next to the Salinas River in the book's final chapter.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more