Skip to main content

Why do you think the village needs a scapegoat in "The Lottery" by Shirley Jackson?

I think the village still needs a scapegoat because they are keeping up old and archaic traditions for the sake of tradition. The story hints at an original reason for the lottery. Mr. Adams is talking to Old Man Warner about other villages starting to give up the tradition of the lottery. Old Man Warner scoffs at the idea, saying he thinks those other villages are full of crazy fools. Old Man Warner then mentions a little phrase about the possible origins of the lottery: "Used to be a saying about 'Lottery in June, corn be heavy soon.'"


It seems the original lottery needed a sacrificial scapegoat in order to secure better crops. A person would be sacrificed and killed by a public stoning. The people probably believed this led to a good rainy season, which would lead to a good crop harvest in the fall.  


Based on my understanding of the story, Old Man Warner is the only person who still remembers that phrase. That tells me the stated purpose of the lottery is not for securing better crops. The people need a scapegoat because that's all they remember needing.   

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more