Skip to main content

Why did nature play such an important role in Helen's education?

Helen Keller had an interest in nature even as a toddler.  She loved to be out in nature.  It brought her both comfort and joy.  When learning, the study of nature was a topic of special interest to her.  She was especially drawn to science and geography for this reason.  Before she lost her sight and hearing, she enjoyed observing nature.  Helen recalled a memory from when she was one year old.  One day, she was "attracted by the flickering shadows of leaves that danced in the sunlight on the smooth floor" (The Story of My Life, Chapter I).  After Helen became deaf and blind, she found solace in nature.  Her senses of smell and touch let her enjoy the beauty of nature.  When Helen was frustrated, she ran to the garden.  She especially loved the flowers there.


After Miss Sullivan came and taught Helen how to communicate, she began teaching her young pupil about nature.  Miss Sullivan took Helen to the river, where she finger spelled lessons into her palm.  The teacher taught her student everything about nature, from the rain to the sun to the animals.  Miss Sullivan taught Helen to appreciate the beauty of nature in new ways.  


One day, Helen was caught alone in a fierce storm.  She felt the air grow cold and she smelled a change in the air.  As the wind picked up speed, Helen hung onto a tree branch.  This experience taught her that nature could be dangerous.


Helen had a special interest in the study of physical geography.  She enjoyed learning about mountains, rivers, and other physical geographic features.  Helen found it to be "a joy to learn the secrets of nature" (The Story of My Life, Chapter XVII).

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more