Skip to main content

In the novel To Kill a Mockingbird, when did Atticus tell his children not to judge anyone until they got to know them?

In Chapter 23, Atticus discusses the trial with Jem and Scout and explains to his children that there was a member of the jury who was a relative of the Cunninghams that argued for an outright acquittal. Jem is shocked and comments,



"Golly Moses...One minute they're tryin' to kill him and the next they're tryin' to turn him loose...I'll never understand those folks as long as I live" (Lee 136).



Atticus then tells his children that they just had to know them. He goes on to explain that the Cunninghams hadn't taken anything from or off of anybody since they immigrated to America. The other thing about the Cunninghams was that once you earned their respect, "they were for you tooth and nail." Atticus tells Jem and Scout that after their encounter with the Old Sarum bunch that night outside of the jailhouse, they earned the Cunningham's respect.


Atticus is essentially teaching his children not to judge individuals until they get to know them by explaining that the Cunninghams were good people. Despite Jem and Scout's negative impressions of the Cunninghams from their interactions at the jailhouse, Atticus tells them that the Cunningham family has integrity and loyalty.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.