Skip to main content

How were girls treated in India back in 19th Century?

In traditional Indian society, a woman was expected to become a wife and mother and her childhood was considered preparation for this. Girls would learn how to cook, keep house, and care for their future husbands and children. Girls were not allowed to go to school because it was not expected to help them in their proper role as a wife and mother. By the time a girl was in her teenage years, it was common to have a marriage arranged and in the works. Girls would leave their parents' homes to live with their husbands and become mothers often before reaching adulthood. Girls were really considered a burden on their parents because they could not earn money for the home or take care of their parents in old age, and it was expected that their parents would pay a dowry, too. For this reason, infanticide was very common in India until the 20th century or so. It persists in rural areas or in the form of sex-selective abortion through all sects of society.


During the second half of the 19th century, the presence of the British had a big influence on the roles and status of women and girls. The Indian people, especially the expanding middle class, wanted to appeal to British social life and this included changing the treatment of girl children. In addition to establishing a number of missionary schools, the Crown began tracking literacy and female infanticide rates as a way of initiating reform in the status of girl children. Though there have been criticisms of the social, moral, and economic reforms imposed by the British government, it is undeniable that they set the stage for improving the lives of girl children.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.