Skip to main content

Why does Mr Otis purchase Canterville Chase in spite of the warnings made by Lord Canterville?

At the beginning of Chapter One of "The Canterville Ghost," Lord Canterville makes it very clear to Mr Otis that the property is haunted. Despite his warnings, Mr Otis is more than happy to buy the property and move in with his family. His reasoning for this decision is very  clear, as he tells Lord Canterville:



But there is no such thing, sir, as a ghost.



Mr Otis completely refuses to accept the existence of the supernatural. If ghosts are real, thinks Mr Otis, then surely they would be bought by Americans and displayed in museums. His sceptical attitude derives, primarily, from his background: he comes from the wealthy, modern world of America where science and reason have triumphed. This world is far removed from that of the ancient British aristocracy, represented here by Lord Canterville, whom Mr Otis associates with myths and legends. It is this obvious clash between the views of Mr Otis and Lord Canterville which sets the tone for the rest of the story and prepares the reader for the upcoming battles between the family and the Canterville ghost. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more