Skip to main content

In Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice, put yourself in Portia's shoes in Act 3, Scene 2. What will you do and why?

Act 3, Scene 2 of Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice is when Bassanio wants to try his luck by choosing from the three caskets for Portia's hand in marriage. Based on the previous suitors who have failed, Portia feels that Bassanio could choose incorrectly and fail just as easily. She actually loves Bassanio and she is tempted to tell him how to choose correctly so she can keep him. She doesn't want to cheat for Bassanio because that would mean that she loses her integrity in the process, but she doesn't want to lose him, either. Therefore, the question is basically asking if you would cheat by telling Bassanio which casket to choose, or if you would continue honoring your father's memory and wishes by remaining silent and allowing him to choose for himself without help. This is a difficult question because we know that Bassanio passes the test and chooses correctly without Portia's help. However, at the point in time that Portia does not know if he will choose correctly, it would be a difficult position to be in.


Therefore, you must decide if honoring your father's memory and keeping your integrity intact are more important than spending the rest of your life without the one you love. One could argue that since your father is dead in this scenario, he wouldn't know the difference if you told Bassanio the answer. On the other hand, there may be a servant watching in the wings who could take away your fortune if your cheating was discovered. Either way, I would cheat and tell Bassanio which casket to choose for fear of losing the one I love. I'd say to myself that my father is gone and his game is unjust; therefore, I have a right to live my life the way I see fit.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more