Skip to main content

How would you feel if your family had a “telling of feelings” after dinner every night, as is done in The Giver by Lois Lowry?

For this assignment, your teacher clearly expects you to share how you would feel if your family had such a custom.  But I can certainly share what my feelings would be.  As a parent or as a child, I would not be pleased with this ritual because of the purpose of the ritual and the invasion of privacy it represents.  The sharing of feelings is meant to ascertain whether or not anyone in the family has any feelings that would threaten the community in any way, which would be pretty much any normal human emotion such as desire, envy, or anger.  Once someone reveals an emotion, it is clear that he or she is talked out of it, or in the case of sexual desire, is given a pill to repress it.  And even in a close family, people should be entitled to keep their feelings to themselves, if they are so inclined.  As a child, I certainly would have hated having to do this every evening, and as a parent, I cannot imagine invading my own children's privacy this way. The community has created a ritual that is akin to mind policing. Those are my thoughts and feelings on the question, and now it is your turn to share what you think, although not every night at dinner!  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.