Skip to main content

In An Inspector Calls, how is the light meant to change after the arrival of the Inspector? What does this type of lighting remind you of?

There are no clear stage directions with regard to lighting in the script itself, but one can assume that the bright and jovial mood in the room would definitely be toned down by the arrival of inspector Goole and, as such, the light would also, to reflect this, be turned down a notch. It would, therefore, be practical to dim the lights slightly once the inspector arrives. Even better would be a slight flickering of the lights and maybe a brief haze in the fireplace. This would indicate to the audience the significance of the inspector's arrival and would suggest a supernatural identity.


The slight adjustment to the light on the inspector's arrival would make the audience instantly aware that the he is no ordinary man and would add to the drama. It would also create an eerie atmosphere and ensure greater interest in the events about to unfold. The creation of such a mood would be supported later when the inspector displays his uncanny insight into not only Eva's unnatural death, but also his inexplicable knowledge of the relationships each of the characters had with this unfortunate girl. This awareness by the audience would keep it in greater suspense for it would want to know who or what the inspector actually is and would not betray the plot. An expectation of something would be created and would create deeper intrigue.


This type of lighting change would remind one of the supernatural elements and events present in one's daily life - those inexplicable little occurrences, such as, for example, deja vu, which we cannot always explain. These experiences add to our discomfort and uncertainty and act as a warning, I suppose, that we should not just take anything for granted as the Birlings and Gerald obviously did.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more