Skip to main content

What made the Wizard of Oz finally agree to see Dorothy and her friends?

In the book version of The Wizard of Oz, Oz is initially described as angry at Dorothy's request to see him. However, he agrees to meet with Dorothy when he finds out she is wearing silver shoes and has a mark on her forehead. The soldier who takes her message to the Wizard explains, "when I mentioned your silver shoes he was very much interested." Then the soldier relates that when he told Oz about "the mark upon your forehead," the Wizard allowed Dorothy an audience.


Once in the throne room, Dorothy is questioned by Oz and tells him that the shoes come from the Wicked Witch of the East and the mark on her forehead from being kissed by the Good Witch of the North.


After she destroys the Wicked Witch of the West, Dorothy and her friends return to see Oz. He brushes them off until the Scarecrow tells him he will send in the Winged Monkeys to find out whether the Wizard "keeps his promises or not." This threat frightens the Wizard so much that he agrees to see all three of them, and, this time, is true to his word.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more