Skip to main content

What role did religion play in Nat Turner's revolt?

The worst fears and nightmares of the white Southerners became a reality in August of 1831. They had tried to prevent this moment for decades through such methods as prohibiting slaves from learning to read and write. Through their efforts at controlling the slaves, they introduced thousands of Africans to the religion of Christianity. This proved to be a mistake for them in 1831. It was in this year that Nat Turner, a slave in Virginia, led the bloodiest slave revolt in American history.


Religion, namely Christianity was an important catalyst for this slave insurrection. Nat Turner was a very popular evangelist among the slave population. He was convinced that God chose him to lead his people to freedom in the same way that Moses led his people out of Egypt. It is quite possible that Nat Turner did not speak directly to God and this was a figment of his imagination. Regardless of the validity of the revelations, Nat Turner's faith was an important impetus for organizing the slave revolt.  In general, Christianity was an important factor in the abolitionist crusade as well as most of the slave revolts that took place.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.