Skip to main content

In Coelho's The Alchemist, how does the reader know that more trouble awaits Santiago?

Before Santiago travels to Africa to start his journey, he receives guidance from the king of Salem. Discussions about achieving one's Personal Legend encourage and inspire both the boy and the reader for the upcoming search for the treasure. Melchizedek also gives him the Urim and Thummim to help him if the boy ever feels stuck and can't read the omens. Everything seems perfectly in place for the boy to succeed. However, when he gets to Africa, to the port of Tangier, he falls victim to a thief's trickery and is robbed. The unforeseeable becomes the inevitable in hindsight. The realization that achieving one's Personal Legend won't be easy or simple comes to light, which forces Santiago to decide whether he will continue on his journey despite his humiliating loss, or go home. Looking back to one of the last pieces of advice the king of Salem gave him foreshadows the fact that misfortune would also accompany the boy on his travels:



"Don't forget that everything you deal with is only one thing and nothing else. And don't forget the language of the omens. And, above all, don't forget to follow your Personal Legend through to its conclusion" (30).



Naively trusting a stranger, therefore, is just "one thing and nothing else." It doesn't have to be the end of everything the boy plans to do. Once the boy loses his money to the thief, though, he struggles with its meaning. Does this experience mean that he should turn back? No. After thinking about Melchizedek and the reason he is on this journey, he decides that he must make his own decisions and take command of his fate. This is the first lesson that the boy learns about achieving one's Personal Legend. It won't be easy and it won't be without suffering and opposition; but in the end, it will be worth it.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more